Los Angeles City Hall. A few blocks away, eleven thousand homeless people bed down on Skid Row for the night. Directly opposite, in front of the imposing Police Station, a film crew shoot a commercial for a sleek, silver car. The only police presence on site are two cops, watching the cameramen, smoking Parliaments and shooting the shit. They decline to give their names, and don’t seem to know the whereabouts of the six LAPD officers assigned overtime to watch Occupy LA. “How long are those guys gonna stay?” they ask, nodding to the lawn, crammed with tents, protestors and signs -- at the last estimate, around 370 people are bedding down there each night. “Surely it’s not fair for the people who want to eat their lunch on the lawn?” From the City of Tents, the beat of a drum starts up again. A mood of anxiety and frustration pervades. The evening before, Oakland was attacked. The very next day, the formerly welcoming Mayor Villaraigosa seemed unenthusiastic about their presence. "Look, our lawn is dead, our sprinklers aren't working . . . our trees are without water," he said. The party, “cannot continue indefinitely”. Officially, the relationship between Occupy LA, LAPD and City Council continues to be a productive one. Occupy LA’s twitter feed glows with positive messages: #LAPD and #OccupyLA share a respectful and positive relationship. City Hall supports us, as we continue to grow and organize. LAPD’s official stance on the occupiers is that “There has been no arrests, no trouble reported, no complaints of noise from nearby residents. All groups are very peaceful, and we have no knowledge of any illegal drug use on site”. City Council echo the same message. Richard Alarcón, the council member who has shown the Occupiers the most support, reiterated that City Council and LAPD are happy to host the Occupiers as long as they are not “conducting themselves in a manner which is illegal, unhealthy, unsafe or damaging city property, or beyond the level which we believe they have the ability to repair - that [doubt regarding ability to pay for repairs] is what you’re hearing from The Mayor and Bill Rosendahl right now.”
The Occupiers know that the good relationship they have with the City Council and LAPD may turn sour at any moment. It’s all they talk about. A contingency plan. Gas masks. A meeting point if things turn ugly. There are also peculiar problems unique to Los Angeles and their location which urgently need to be addressed -- not least of which is the bad rap they’re getting in the local community for noisy partying and the suggested use of illegal drugs. The problems are discussed daily in Livestreamed General Assemblies and committee meetings, as well as being publicized in The Fix, blog posts on the Occupy LA website, and in articles and comments on LA Weekly and The LA Times - so its surprising that the City Council and LAPD claim they are unaware of the issues. The occupiers know they won’t get support in dealing with internal divisions from outside. They’re working overtime on confronting the problems themself. There’s already a new flyer on the Occupy LA website: ‘More Revolution, Less Party’ -- and leaflets handed out across camp bear the same message. The silk-screen printers are designing new logos with a similar theme to adorn a mass of donated clothes, bed-sheets and bandanas. A tent village, housing the media team, has a whiteboard propped outside: “Don’t ask us for cigarettes. The only thing we can give you is the news. MORE REVOLUTION, LESS PARTY!” It echoes similar signs which were posted all over Madrid for the 15th May movement, the precursor to Occupy Wall Street. Giant signs on the plaza read "REVOLUCIón NO BOTTELLón!" or "Menos botellón, mas revolución" (Revolution, not party....less partying, more rebelling). It didn't stop people in Madrid from partying, according to Esteban Gil, a Berkeley graduate and Occupier who works on the Facilitation Committee here in LA. But it made them be more discreet.
There can be no doubt that the Occupiers currently living in tents outside Los Angeles’ City Hall are facing an internal crisis of sorts, brought about by the very fact they seem to be the only large occupation in the United States who have not suffered from police brutality. A large medical marijuana contingent, courtesy of a lenient interpretation of Proposition 215, intense proximity to Skid-Row, and an uncertain police force still reeling from the PR nightmares of past-riots and scandals, has led to a peculiarly relaxed and permissive atmosphere. “All it takes is one brown person to come down, and this turns into a race riot,” says Liz Savage, on the social media team, explaining LAPD’s unusual stance towards Occupiers. The lack of active opposition has created a volatile melting pot of hardcore protestors and activists -- alongside young hedonists and the poorest, most dispossessed sections of society. Cracking down on drug and alcohol abuse, petty crime, and the party contingent who are along for the ride, is Occupy LA’s most immediate problem -- and their biggest challenge in terms of PR. “If we had the same kind of external threats that Oakland and the other occupations had, we would have much more unity and camaraderie here in LA,” says Daniil Dillinger, a member of Occupy LA’s webteam. “There are kids in the minority here who feel alienated from the current system, so they come to us. But then they find that we’re a complicated mass of committees, everyone’s working all the time, the Police don’t seem to care if they smell weed, the atmosphere’s pretty relaxed -- and so they do what they like best. They drum, and they party.”
Occupy LA’s Head of Security (or “Peacemakers” as they are known by the Occupiers), Emilio Arreola says, “If I see the hard shit -- heroin, crack -- I throw those people out. But marijuana? I don’t have the legal right to enforce that.” Emilio estimates that of 370 residents living on the site full time, about forty are from Skid Row, and approximately twenty are; “Kids who don’t know how to act. We try to take care of them, but that’s what the media picks up on: kids partying. They don’t see the majority of us running the show and doing our best to keep the movement together.”
Along with the party tribe, the site’s proximity to Skid Row has been both a blessing and a curse. Within days of taking Occupation of City Hall, Skid Row residents started showing up for food and water -- and thefts and violence soon followed. It took six policemen to put one violent individual in a car, and carry him off. But since working with local Skid Row advocacy groups like LA-CAN (Los Angeles Community Action Network), starting their own ‘Occupy the Hood’ affinity group, and instituting a policy of self-policing, thefts and security have improved. “A good number [of Skid Row residents] are really awesome and help us out with other Skid Row people,” says Emilio. “They have their own style and way of dealing with that shit.” A young girl from the Action Committee with a determined jaw butts in, “I think it’s weird to call out all the different groups here. We’re all the 99%”.
Not to LA City Council. There seems to be a direct correlation between their positive attitude towards the movement when it seemed merely a few discontent, educated, middle-class types -- to the new, more worried tone adopted by the Mayor and council members now that OLA has become an increasingly fractious and volatile group encompassing the most dispossessed and ignored factions of Los Angeles’ Society. “The fact that the word ‘homeless’ is thrown into every article about the Occupy Los Angeles movement in order to invalidate it, is just hypocritical,” says Becky Dennison of LA-CAN. She sees the change in attitude of Mayor Villaraigosa and Councilmember Bill Rosendahl, who responded so positively to the Occupiers only a month earlier, as evidence that an increase in support from the dispossessed is challenging Los Angeles’ local politics and the controversial economic policies the city has pursued over the last few years. She cites the 2.2 million in Federal funding earmarked for Skid Row, 1 million of which was given to the San Francisco based architecture firm Gensler - the same firm handling the NFL stadium project. Eli Broad, one of the richest men in LA, was given a 50 million dollar subsidy by the city. “When the City Council supported Occupy LA, they were supporting the 99% -- and that includes the homeless,” says Becky. “But it’s not surprising that once the race and class dynamic of the occupation changed, and all these folks most affected by local politics started to emerge, the Mayor and City Council’s attitude changed.”
Along with ‘More Revolution, Less Party’ signs, the Medics on site keep a watchful eye on their residents, whether from Skid Row or Melrose Avenue. Patricia Sanchez, who works in the First Aid tent and offers CPR training to Occupiers onsite, explains: “We have AA and NA running meetings everyday, and we try and make sure everyone is fed and hydrated. Sometimes I’ll see someone covered in a blanket, just lying on the floor, and I’ll sit with them a while, make sure they’re breathing. We actually got one guy into rehab in the first week. That was pretty amazing.”
But it seems only a matter of time before Occupy LA receives the same treatment as Oakland and Wall Street. Occupiers are convinced, though, that the attack, when it comes, will be of a more insidious variety. Emilio estimates that there are at least fifteen “plants” on site at any one time. “I’ve seen them walk round the block, and get into cop cars. It’s obvious who they are. The authorities are playing it smart with us. They’re hoping we’ll eat ourselves from the inside out, saying the Local Farmers [who have had to move their weekly Farmers market because of Occupiers’ tents] are pissed at us, everyone’s on drugs, all we do is party. It exists, but most of us are on two committees at once, getting no sleep because we’re working all the time.” As he says this, the distant stirrings of OLA’s nightly General Assembly is drowned out by an angry, volatile group who want to talk about Oakland, the Mayor, and when -- what they see as the inevitable -- attack will happen. The crowd -- about 300 people -- are at first yelling over each other, drowning out the General Assembly, until a woman from Oakland takes the mic and starts to talk about what happened “that” night. Pin-drop silence ensues. She’s followed by a man in a suit who used to work on Wall St, and urges everyone to load up on gas masks, join more committees, and stay alert. “It’s kind of like Thanksgiving dinner. Everyone’s family looks crazier than yours. But this, here, the craziness -- this is how it works,” laughs Patricia.
Daniil chimes in. “The point is that we’re a microcosm of LA society. To deny the presence of drugs and alcohol on the streets of Los Angeles would be disingenuous. We have a very evident problem and it’s been transferred to our camp, but unlike LA City Council, we’re not denying that problem.” Mayor Villaraigosa and Bill Rosendahl refused to comment on this issue, but when pressed, Alarcon admitted that “The issues [between Tent City and Skid Row] are relatively the same” and urged Occupiers not to try and deal with rogue elements alone, but call the Police to stymie illegal activity.
The heavy, sweet scent of marijuana still lingers in the air as another General Assembly drifts to a close. Occupiers wander back to their tents, and a documentary -- “Ghetto Physics” -- is projected on the faux-marble fountain for those who are left. A group passing by are talking about someone’s suggestion that the movement erect a Tent specifically for medical-marijuana card holders to “medicate” in peace. Half the camp are divided between wanting the “Zero-Tolerance” Policy adopted in New York. Half are violently opposed. A young man who’s just arrived from OWS turns to the group in shock. “I can’t believe this is what you guys are arguing about in LA. This is a fucking revolution. When the cops are coming for you, I can guarantee the last thing you’re gonna be thinking about is weed.” The group stops and considers. “Yeah, until after the fact. Then everyone’s gonna wanna toke.”

7 Comments
Great Report Ruth this is a MUST READ...
Submitted by Rancho Larry on
Rancho Larry
This Ain’t No Party This Ain’t No Disco This Ain’t no Fooling Around..
always impressed keep it up
Submitted by Justice4all on
this is the stuff that should be being written about in all the newspapers. if i had a newspaper you guys would be my top reporters!!!
"IF you think in terms of a year, plant a seed, if in terms of ten years, plant trees, if in terms of 100 years, teach the people" -Confucius
WE MUST TEACH THE PEOPLE!
Awesome Ruth
Submitted by Fex on
Awesome, thanks for writing this.
"Word following word- I wrought words. Deed following deed, I wrought deeds." - The Havamal
Great article! If occupiers
Submitted by prayn4peace on
Great article! If occupiers work with the police on the illegal activity, then the real issues can be addressed more effectively and the media will have to focus on issues instead of illegality.
Rancho Larry....
Submitted by Ruth Fowler on
Rancho Larry - how did the proposal go at City Hall re: garden boxes? Did someone bring a proposal, or just the police request and generate debate on it?
Outstanding
Submitted by tovangar2 on
Thank you Ruth
Re any damage to City Hall park landscaping and doubts about Occupy LA's ability to pay for repairs, I have been assured that several environmentally-responsible landscaping firms would be more than willing to relandscape the grounds gratis (when the time comes), as it would be the jewel in the crown on their resumes. A xeriscape would make much more sense than a "traditional" landscape, especially considering that the city pays homeowners $1 per sq ft to remove their lawns. An example needs to be set.
Also, just for clarification, the money billionaire Eli Broad was given by city government to build a parking structure for his ego-fueled museum was the bulk of the money set aside for "blight abatement" in our city's most under-served neighborhoods.
So, no more complaining please Mayor & Councilmembers about the landscaping or any costs involved in repairing/replacing it.
A VEHICLE FOR CHANGE
Submitted by dan cooper on
If we could put together a petition to repeal SBX211 (retro active immunity) given to judges for taking bribes from the county and given to all governmental employee's that gave the bribes, Then you would put yourself in a very stong possition for further negotiations. LET ME PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY.
1. judges get paid a state salary of $178,789.00 a year with medical and retirement benefits up to 75% of their salary from the state.
2. Los Angeles County is currenty giving the judges an additional $57,688.00 per year per judge. there are 460 judges that equals to $26,536,480.00 per year.
3. in the case of sturgeon vs Los Angeles County those payments were found to be unconstitutional / illegal. after that decission the judges paid a lobbyist to pass SBX211 ( retro active immunity from prosecution)
4. There is no bigger user of the court then L.A.County, put it this way, if you and I were in court and my name is L.A. County and your name is OWS and I hand the judge $57,688.00 and I tell him I'm concerned about his retirement and I want to give you some suplimental benefitts. THAT IS A BRIBE.
5. If we demand to repeal SBX211 and demand that corperations and governmental agencie's are held to the same standards of the LAW that everyone else is held to the LAW. then we could exspect juctice and fair play.
6. demand that the $26 and a half million per year spent on suplamental benefitts be appropriated towards a fair and open banking commitee. ( don't worry about those judges they are well compensated by the STATE as per the CA constitution.) Also if SBX211 was repealed the judges would be forced to return all the money they took from the county. APPOXIMATELY $400 MILLION. If you want a bank oversight committee you will need to hire alot of accountants. $400 million plus $26.5 million annually would be a very good way to actually do it.
7. here is a list of reasons for the petition to repeal SBX211.
A. SBX211 does not restore due process
B. SBX211 violates Article 1 section 9
C. SBX211 violates the 14th amendment (no equal protections)
D. SBX211 violate checks and balances between legislative and Judicial powers.
E. Judges do not disclose the county payments at the onset of any trial where the county is either a party to the case or has a financial interest. (Judges violate Judicial codes of ethics)
F. Judges refuse to recuse themselves when requested under CCP170
G. Judges find themselves unbiased and then file an order striking statement.
ADDITIONAL FOOD FOR THOUGHT BELOW
Robert kennedy spoke out against retro active immunity..."QUOTE" (The very idea of "retroactive immunity" ... is so radical, so repugnant to the most basic principles of the "rule of law," that only one prior attempt can be found in recent history (at least from my research): the efforts by some in Congress (in 1965) to enact a law retroactively legalizing the mergers by six large banks which clearly -- as a federal court found -- were illegal under our nation's antitrust laws.
The banks knew when they merged that they were almost certainly violating anti-trust laws. But they did it anyway. And when courts began ruling that their behavior was illegal, they ran to Congress to demand that a law be passed granting them amnesty, claiming that the consequences would be ruinous if they were held accountable under the law. ) But the very concept of retroactive amnesty, the idea that corporations could break the law and then have Congress pass a special law legalizing their lawbreaking conduct, was so profoundly offensive to Sen. Robert Kennedy (who had been the Attorney General when the banks broke the law with their mergers), as well as then-Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, that they engaged in extraordinary efforts to try to put a stop to this Congressional travesty.when the banks broke the law with their mergers
Robert Kennedy could not stop them.
SECTION FROM SBX211
This bill would provide that no governmental entity, or officer or employee of a governmental entity, shall incur any liability or be subject to prosecution or disciplinary action because of benefits provided to a judge under the official action of a governmental entity prior to the effective date of this bill on the ground that those benefits were not authorized under law.
Pages