Greetings, OLA members. We may have the greatest opportunity to actually Occupy the LAPD. Many of us have seen the news of former LAPD Officer and Navy Officer Christopher Dorner lately and have read his manifesto. Here is the manifesto

You're read the headline and you said: WTF? Indefinite Detention is unconstitutional. Actually no, it isn't. More than 70 years ago, a law was passed in Congress to allow this to happen. Let me explain

"When Obama signed to law the NDAA: Indefinite Detention, did you know that there was precedence and what Obama did was "legal"? How was it legal? Another Democratic President did the same thing...Roosevelt...when he signed Executive Order 9066 rounding up more than 120,000 Americans of Japanese ancestry. Congress passed: Public Law 77-503 (http://tinyurl.com/y3mw86) giving power to the military to detain American citizens during times of war.

Three men broke the law by not obeying Public Law 77-503 by not going to the concentration camps. They were arrested. They were Min Yasui, Fred Korematsu and Gordon Hirabayashi. More than 40 years later, all three men were found not guilty under coram nobis (http://tinyurl.com/8gxco9w) and their conviction records were overturned. But what about Public Law 77-503? Many attorneys say: because of coram nobis, Public Law 77-503 was legally overturned, mainly because of judicial review. The Supreme Court has the power to overturn a law created by Congress if they deem unconstitutional. No they don't.

ARTICLE III (http://tinyurl.com/ct4xuvu) does not give the power to the SCOTUS to overturn P.L. 77-503. Only Congress has the power. And because Congress has the power, Not one member of Congress, from 1942 to 2012, in 70 years, challenged P.L. 77-503. And because of what the Democratic party did 70 years ago, the Democratic Party 70 years later is just continuing the legacy."

I just want to give all the members of OWS heads up and I hope you share this.

I hate to tell you this, but I told you so. No, not the OWSLA members, but the folks who said that OWS members are dirty-hippies-communist-socialist-fascist-Barack-Obama-Muslim-loving-terrorists. These same folks hated Obama because he's not American, while we as OWSLA and OWS members dislike his policy. But then there is something to dislike President Obama, and even more.

http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/dhs-releases-more-documents.html

No not because he's black, but because his comments:

Thirty seven seconds in, Obama is supportive of the peaceful revolution. Was it because we are the country of the freedom for countries that live under a dictatorship and is not a part of any austerity measure? And he feels that we as U.S. citizens must be monitored? For what, terrorism? Still, I wondered why were there a mass release after N-30? According to L.A. Weekly, it's because OWSLA clogged the courts and demanded a speedy trial? True, but also, a database of all who were and are part of the Occupy Wall Street movement. The arrests were just a show to gather intelligence illegally for the government, ran by the corporations...can you say fascism?

It's a sad and sick day when Bank of America can dictate policies and laws when it was reserved of, by and for the people. Not corporate personhood, but human beings.

Sitting in a studio, the clock is ticking. Your heart races, your mind is running even faster, you check every detail of your broadcast, the chat is going well, you advertise like crazy, you sponsor a professional radio show and voilà, the camera is on and you broadcast your show. Well, it didn't go exactly as like that, but after the bugs get straightened out, the kinks ironed out, the show ran flawlessly.

That show Insight Out News with Margot Paez.

That according to Debka Files: